2. Environmental information

This section covers the effects, risks, opportunities, governance, strategies, actions, and results of Deloitte's identified material environmental impacts, risks and opportunities. 

In line with the ESRS, we will describe the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities for the environmental sustainability matters not in scope of our reporting due to a lack of materiality.

Table 04: materiality processes and considerations with regard to non-material environmental sustainability matters

ESRS

Topic

Processes and considerations

E2

Pollution

Offices screened for possible use of pollutants in cleaning processes
Social impact of exhaust gasses of ICE vehicles calculated
Spend analysis conducted for upstream business activities
Assumption that our downstream activities (audit and business advisory) will not materially affect pollution by our clients
Due to very low level of impact, affected communities were not consulted

E3

Water and marine resources

Water consumption in offices is measured on a monthly basis
Social impact of water consumption calculated
Spend analysis conducted for upstream business activities
Assumption that our downstream activities (audit and business advisory) will not causally or materially affect water and marine resources by our clients
Due to very low level of impact, affected communities were not consulted

E4

Biodiversity and ecosystem

We have identified and assessed actual and potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems at own site locations and in the upstream and downstream value chain, using social impact calculations and spend analysis for upstream activities as well as an impact study we performed in 2022 on biodiversity and nature. Our assumption is that there is no causal or material effect of our downstream activities (audit and business advisory) that affect biodiversity and ecosystems
There is limited dependency of our services on biodiversity and ecosystems throughout our value chain
On the basis of our analysis (spend, review of own sites) we have concluded that in the short to medium term there are no material transition and physical risks, nor systemic risks that affect Deloitte.
We do not operate sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas
It has not been concluded that it is necessary to implement biodiversity mitigation measures, such as those identified in: Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation of wild birds; Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora
Due to low level of impact, affected communities were not consulted

E5

Resource use and circular economy

Waste generation in offices is measured on a monthly basis
Social impact of waste generation calculated
Spend analysis conducted for upstream business activities; initiatives in IT have started
Assumption that our downstream activities (audit and business advisory) will not causally nor materially affect resource use and circular economy by our clients
Due to very low level of impact, affected communities were not consulted

2.1 Climate and CO2

­

Key results

­

Material impacts, risks and opportunities

As our organisation grows, so does our responsibility and opportunity to drive positive environmental change. We burn fuels to heat our buildings, purchase electricity to power our buildings and charge our cars, and we buy airline or railway tickets to travel to international clients. We also have suppliers who emit CO2 to produce and transport their goods or render their services to us. We fully recognise and understand that our operations have a negative environmental impact. We are dedicated to minimising this impact and have established a clear strategy towards achieving this.

In our Double Materiality Assessment as included on pages 93-98, we have identified the following material IROs for Climate and CO2:

  1. Risk that extreme weather events can impact infrastructure (e.g., data and delivery centres) and employee productivity, thus putting business operations and service delivery at risk​

  2. Risk that clients in sectors that are highly exposed to climate change and/or that are unable to transition can potentially result in decrease in revenues for Deloitte

  3. Impact (positive and negative) of our business activities on GHG emissions throughout our value chain

  4. Opportunity to increase revenue growth by expanding climate-related services to support clients in their response to climate change​

  5. Reputational risk of association with clients perceived as having an inadequate response to climate change or inadequate climate credentials​

  6. Risk and opportunity that meeting clients' and other stakeholders' expectations on climate impact management can impact reputation and revenues

Climate risk

In December 2025, Deloitte NSE published their report describing the climate-related financial disclosures for NSE and its geographies. It contains a comprehensive overview of our global climate ambitions, impacts and the risks that apply to our business. Our assessment of financial risks and opportunities in determining materiality is informed by this publication.

NSE climate risk process

Deloitte employs a comprehensive Enterprise Risk Framework (ERF) to identify, assess, manage, and monitor risks at both the NSE and local national practice levels. This framework outlines the NSE Executive’s evaluation of key and emerging risks that could affect the firm's strategic objectives, public obligations, and reputation.

Climate change and sustainability concerns are integral to the ERF, with risks categorised by their likelihood and potential impact. These risks are assessed across four dimensions: strategic differentiation, brand reputation, operational resilience, and workforce purpose. Significant climate-related risks include regulatory changes and shifting client needs, which are analysed using qualitative scenario assessments.

The Enterprise Risk and Monitoring (ERM) Team oversees the ERF, assigning Executive Risk Owners to manage climate-related risks actively. Regular meetings between the ERM team and these owners focus on risk management effectiveness, mitigation strategies, and necessary actions. The ERM team maintains a risk dashboard for ongoing assessment and validation of risks, with a mandatory review every six months involving the NSE Chief Risk Officer (CRO).

Executive Risk Owners present their assessments of climate risks to the NSE Executive, which are then reviewed by the NSE Audit and Risk Committee (ARC). The Climate Steering Committee ensures accountability for managing climate-related risks, evaluates outcomes, and provides a comprehensive overview of climate impacts to the NSE Executive, solidifying the integration of climate risk management into Deloitte's broader risk management processes.

Time Horizons

For the purpose of defining climate-related risks and opportunities, Deloitte maintains time-horizons that deviate from the definitions provided in section 1.1 of this Annex:

  • Short-term (up to 2027) is aligned with Deloitte’s internal planning and forecasting time
    frames;

  • Medium-term (2027-2030) is in line with the firm’s near-term 2030 goals;

  • Long-term (2030-2050) is defined through to 2050 in line with UK and EU jurisdictional net-zero targets.

Climate Scenarios

Deloitte NSE has selected the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) Climate Scenarios for use in its scenario analysis. Deloitte NSE is a professional services organisation with diverse geographic and sectoral exposure similar to that experienced in the financial services sector. On this basis, we consider the NGFS scenarios to be most suitable to understand how Deloitte NSE’s climate and risk exposure and resilience could evolve in the future, as a result of different climate change trends.

Deloitte selected three scenarios – Current Policies (3°C), Divergent Net Zero and Orderly Net Zero by 2050 – to assess the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities across the applicable short, medium, and long-term time horizons. The use of two net-zero scenarios with similar policy ambitions (below 1.5°C) but different policy reactions enables a range of risks and opportunities to be captured in a transition scenario, factoring in the market and regulatory drivers to which Deloitte NSE is most exposed. This is particularly relevant given the comparable climate policies and net-zero ambitions of the UK and EU, and the relative financial importance of these markets to Deloitte NSE’s overall revenue. The Current Policies scenario represents a significantly warmer future where physical climate impacts could put business operations and continuity at risk.

Analysis performed in 2023 used the firm’s internal scenario modelling to assess each climate scenario’s potential positive and negative implications. The selected scenarios enable Deloitte to robustly assess the impacts of climate change over the short, medium, and long-term under three possible pathways, with global warming ranging from 1.5°C to 3°C. As there have been no material changes to the firm in 2025/2026, the results of the analysis are still valid. The firm recognises that under CFD requirements it is expected to review and refresh its scenario analysis at least every three years. This will next be undertaken for the 2026/2027 disclosures.

Process for defining climate-related risks and opportunities

The climate-related risks and opportunities assessment used the same likelihood and impact risk criteria as the firm’s Enterprise Risk Framework (ERF), which is described in the Risk management section above.

The identified climate-related risks and opportunities were assessed by members of the Climate SteerCo (as well as other key senior stakeholders across Deloitte NSE) by scoring the likelihood and impact for each risk and opportunity. Together with qualitative analysis based on market data, an average combined score was then calculated for each risk and opportunity to understand the significance to Deloitte. Following consideration and approval by the Climate SteerCo, the climate-related risks and opportunities that were determined to have a potential impact on the business have been disclosed below.

Two types of climate-related risks and opportunities have been determined as having a potential impact: physical (acute and chronic) and transition (market, reputation, policy and legal). Further analysis has been performed for these, including impact assessments and scenario modelling (against the three scenarios identified above) and corresponding strategic responses. The results are presented in table 05 below.

Table 05: Material climate-related risks and opportunities

Risk: Physical - Acute and Chronic
Disruption to business operations and service delivery due to extreme weather events impacting infrastructure (e.g., data and delivery centres) and employee productivity.

Description and potential impact to Deloitte
Climate-related physical risks could impact Deloitte’s infrastructure and employees and could result in reduced revenue caused by business disruption and productivity loss. These impacts could be driven by acute (e.g., increased severity of storms, floods and wildfires) or chronic (e.g., rising mean temperatures) physical risks.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
In all scenarios, physical risks to Deloitte will increase from the short to medium-term. Physical risks are expected to be identical in the short-term due to ‘committed warming’ (emissions already released). In the medium term, under the net-zero scenarios, physical risk impact should plateau. Under a 3°C scenario the frequency and severity of extreme weather events will continue to increase over the medium and long-term. The risk to Deloitte infrastructure and employees and corresponding revenues over the long-term aligns accordingly.

Strategic response and resilience
Deloitte embeds physical climate risks into its sustainability strategy and business continuity planning to reduce impacts on productivity and revenue. The firm is ISO 22301 certified and has assessed climate change as a business continuity issue.

Real estate decisions follow a Real Estate Sustainability Policy and "Resilience Design Priorities" within the Better Buildings framework. This guides site selection to avoid future risk, and considers future weather effects on occupant comfort and cooling needs. Physical security teams carry out threat and risk assessments for all offices to identify and manage climate-related risks.

Flexible and hybrid working arrangements help maintain productivity during acute climate events, as many employees can work remotely when needed.

Delivery centres are chosen with physical resilience in mind and are geographically dispersed to protect key staff and reduce the risk of disruption from local climate impacts.

The firm assesses risks to data centres and is moving key systems to the cloud to improve security and resilience across critical systems and infrastructure.

A diversified global supply chain and our Responsible Procurement Policy strengthen supplier resilience by requiring suppliers to take steps to reduce their climate impacts.

Risk: Transition (market)
Change in revenue from clients in sectors that are highly exposed to climate change and/or that are unable to transition.

We recognise that we will be impacted in some way by the policy, market and technological changes brought by a transition towards a low-carbon economy. The precise nature and scale of the impact
for certain sectors and companies is unclear. Deloitte has a large client base and it is likely that climate change will negatively impact some of our clients. This may reduce revenue from client engagements.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
Different climate scenarios create different risks for businesses. The timing and type of impact vary between physical risks (from extreme weather and long-term climate change) and transition risks (from changes to policy, technology and markets). Under a 3°C scenario: physical risks grow steadily in the medium to long term, while transition risks are relatively limited. Under the Orderly Net Zero scenario transition risks are concentrated in the short to medium term as companies adjust to new rules and technologies, but these risks ease in the long term as adaptation occurs. In the Divergent Net Zero scenario, businesses may face low short-term risk, but transition risks can rise in the medium term and accelerate in the long term if responses are uneven.

For example, in the energy and fossil fuels sector, net-zero scenarios generally see a faster reduction in fossil-fuel use than in the 3°C path. A Divergent Net Zero may produce a steep late decline, while a Coordinated Net Zero transition may show a more gradual fall aided by carbon removal technologies. The 3°C scenario is likely to maintain a relatively high share of fossil fuels in the total energy consumption across time.

Strategic response and resilience
Deloitte has a breadth of experience and understanding of the markets in which it operates, and trends in key industries, sectors and clients. Through thought leadership such as Deloitte Insights, Deloitte’s CXO Survey, Global Consumer Survey, Future of Energy, State of the State and Fast 50 reports, Deloitte not only informs the market, but its own business strategy as well.
Deloitte’s strategy drives its ability to work across multiple sectors and geographies, and with numerous
organisations from listed to entrepreneurs.
This diversified portfolio, together with the long-term trust and relationships that we build with our clients, mean the firm is well-placed to adapt its client portfolio as we move to a low-carbon economy.
We continue to monitor the wider market, industry shifts and portfolio of clients to ensure the firm’s strategy remains relevant and resilient.

Opportunity: Transition (market)
Increased revenue and growth by offering new climate -related services, and expanding existing ones, to support clients in their response to climate change and contribute to the economy-wide, low-carbon transition.

As a global business with a breadth of skills, resources and experience developed through its long-standing relationships with companies across multiple industries, this presents an opportunity to grow
its climate service offerings and corresponding revenues while contributing to economy-wide, low-carbon transitions across its geographies, and creating an impact that matters for clients.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
All three scenarios potentially provide opportunities to increase revenues from climate and sustainability services, but these may vary in nature and timing of service demanded.
Net-zero transition scenarios are expected to result in a higher demand from clients in most, if not all, industries for transition services as new climate policies are introduced. The Orderly Net Zero is more likely to impact in the short term, with the Divergent Net Zero scenario more likely to impact in the medium to long term.
Under the 3°C scenario, increased demand for adaptation and mitigation services due to physical risk exposure is more likely to emerge in the medium to long-term due to the slower introduction of regulations.

Strategic response and resilience
Deloitte’s strategy supports meeting client demand and seizing opportunities in the transition to a low‑carbon economy. We
are investing in sustainability services and data-driven research. We have launched and expanded offerings such as CSRD support, Energy Transition, Future of Food, Sustainability of AI and AI for Sustainability.

In addition, sustainable data and technology tools (for example GreenSpace Tech and GreenLight) and advisory hubs (including the EMEA Sustainability Regulation Hub and NSE Sustainability Tech Hub) have been strengthened.

Deloitte partners with initiatives such as the Global Circularity Protocol, One Planet Network and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) to tackle systemic sustainability issues. Deloitte will continue to innovate and grow these capabilities to meet client needs and wider societal expectations.

Risk and opportunity: Transition (reputation)
Risk: Reduced potential to attract and retain talent across the business because of a perceived inadequate response to climate change.
Opportunity: Increased ability to attract and retain talent by implementing and demonstrating a robust climate response.

People are central to Deloitte’s services and operations. The Deloitte Global 2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey shows over 70% of Gen Z and millennials consider an employer’s environmental credentials important.
Around half of Deloitte’s employees are Gen Z or millennials, so the firm’s action on climate change is likely to influence how current and future staff view the organisation. Changes in staff retention or attrition driven by these perceptions can affect future operating costs, revenues and the firm’s ability to deliver services to clients.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
Under all three scenarios, the awareness of climate issues and the need to embrace action will influence employment decisions and depending on the firm’s performance and credentials, could result in a risk or opportunity. Within this, it is reasonably expected that a more significant proportion of the population will make choices that are also driven by an awareness of climate change and a desire to contribute to the transition through, for example, employment choices in the short, medium and long term.
Similarly, this risk and opportunity would only be expected to materialise in the
medium to longer term under the Divergent Net Zero or 3°C scenarios. Under a 3°C scenario, employees (current and future) will expect action and hence show greater interest in the firm’s climate credentials in the long term, as the physical climate impact increases.

Strategic response and resilience
Deloitte has set a validated science-based target to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, and has updated its near‑term (2030) targets in line with the SBTi Net‑Zero Standard. We obtain external assurance on our environmental and emissions data to track progress reliably.
Sustainability is being embedded across operations: senior leaders are accountable, and policies, tools and initiatives (for example on sustainable travel and the Better Buildings guidance) support climate‑smart choices.
People are central to the climate strategy. We aim to inform, educate and motivate our employees through virtual townhalls, road-shows, a mandatory learning programme and our Climate Champions network.
Deloitte works with its supply chain and clients to encourage the adoption of science‑based targets and reduction of Scope 3 emissions, supporting the wider transition to a low‑carbon economy.
These measures underpin a credible climate response designed to drive performance, attract and retain talent, and help clients and partners decarbonise.

Risk: Transition (reputation)
Damage to reputation and client relationships by failing to act credibly to manage the climate impacts of Deloitte’s operations and value chain.

Deloitte’s reputation and public trust are central to our ability to act in the public interest and to win and maintain client and stakeholder relationships. If the firm is seen to have inadequately tackled climate change across its operations and value chain, public confidence could fall and clients may reduce or cease engagement, with negative effects on revenue and growth. Increasingly, clients expect suppliers to meet minimum climate standards — including net‑zero targets — and these requirements are likely to become stricter; failure to demonstrate appropriate credentials could therefore result in lost contracts and income.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
Under the two net-zero scenarios, this risk increases from the short-term onwards due to an expected increase in policy requirements, and client action and expectation. Deloitte will need to match or exceed this pace of change to avoid a reduction in contracts and revenues.
Under the 3°C scenario, the risk will increase only in the longer term, as the expectations to transition in response to climate change will be lower.

Strategic response and resilience
Strategic response and resilience as for the risk above.

Risk: Transition (reputation)
Reputational damage from providing services to (and therefore being associated with) clients perceived as having an inadequate response to climate change and inadequate climate credentials.

Deloitte’s brand and reputation are driven in part by the clients we serve. As such, providing services to (or being associated with) companies or sectors that are perceived as having unfavourable climate credentials or that are not willing to respond to climate, have not articulated a credible transition plan or are not transparent about their actions to address climate change, could damage Deloitte’s reputation.
As a global organisation, reputational damage from providing services to clients across any of Deloitte’s business offerings could impact growth and revenue associated with future client services.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
A continued expansion of climate legislation is expected under both net-zero scenarios. Where climate expectations of businesses are high, the reputational risks associated with climate inaction are likely to be most significant in the medium to long term.
Under the 3°C scenario, societal expectations and demands for adequate climate action are expected to increase over the medium to long term. Despite this, the reputational impacts that might be associated with climate inaction are likely to be reduced due to the absence of global policy.

Strategic response and resilience
Deloitte’s national practices carry out client and engagement due diligence to decide which work the firm accepts and to prevent inappropriate relationships that could harm our reputation. Where matters raise greater public interest or reputational risk, our Responsible Business Committees reviews and provides guidance. An NSE Public Interest Consistency Group helps ensure a consistent approach across countries and can escalate cross‑border issues for further direction. These reviews cover a range of themes, including the climate implications of client work and the potential for reputational damage.

Risk: Transition (policy and legal)
Increased costs and reputational damage arising because of climate litigation (and/or accusations of greenwashing) including from inadequate provision of climate related services.

The demand for Deloitte’s services has increased, and is likely to continue increasing, as its clients consider climate-related impacts and respond to related legislation. Should the firm fail to meet expected quality standards, it could face an increase in the frequency and severity of climate-related litigation and/or accusations of greenwashing. This could increase costs incurred by Deloitte and lead to reputational damage.

Potential impact under climate scenarios and time horizons
Climate-related litigation is expected to rise under all three scenarios, but the phasing of the increase will vary.
This risk is expected to materialise fastest in the short term under the Orderly Net Zero scenario due to the earlier introduction of stricter climate and greenwashing regulations. Under the Divergent Net Zero and 3°C scenarios, climate-related litigation claims are expected to increase only in the medium and long terms in response to more delayed regulatory transition scenarios.

Strategic response and resilience
Quality of service is central to Deloitte’s strategy, with robust quality management applied across our services and our Audit & Assurance practice complying with ISQM 1. Objectivity remains a core principle, and the firm stresses the importance of delivering high‑quality climate‑related services to meet client expectations and support the wider net‑zero transition. Practitioners receive mandatory training on required policies and standards, and internal reviews of climate engagements further uphold standards and help reduce the risk of reputational harm or climate-related litigation.

As detailed in the ‘Strategic response and resilience’ column in the table above, Deloitte is resilient to the climate-related risks identified and is taking steps to further increase resilience. In the short term, the firm leverages strengths such as its diversified client portfolio and flexible working models. Medium-term strategies include actively monitoring market trends, investing in climate-related service offerings, and implementing the ‘Better Buildings’ framework for sustainable office spaces. Looking to the long term, Deloitte NSE focuses on achieving its sustainability strategy goals, embedding climate considerations into real estate decisions, and fostering a proactive climate-conscious culture to attract and retain talent.

Considerations and conclusions from Deloitte Netherlands

Deloitte NL operates as a company with a low investment in physical assets. According to the notes in the financial statements, sections 4.3 and 4.4, there is a clear differentiation between assets owned by Deloitte and those owned by others, which Deloitte has the right to use. The value of assets owned by Deloitte is €47.9 million, primarily comprising office furnishings and (portable) IT equipment. Similarly, mobile data devices such as laptops and mobile phones are not considered to be at material risk from climate change. Depreciation of office-related assets is in line with the duration of the specific office rental contracts, meaning that physical risks are mitigated to a level that we do not deem them to be material.

Assets owned by others mainly consist of rented office buildings and leased vehicles. Transition risks for vehicles are mitigated by our fleet's transition to electric vehicles. An uncertainty in this area is the installed capacity of the national grid in the Netherlands: in certain areas of the country there is already an overload of the electricity infrastructure. We do not perceive to have any material physical climate risks to our leased vehicles, partly because the maximum lease duration is set to five years. Regarding office spaces, we engage in temporary lease agreements, which afford a level of adaptability in our portfolio of offices should there be shifts in business conditions prompted by climate change. As a result of our approach, we do not regard transition or physical climate risks to assets owned by third parties as material.

As we do not have significant owned assets and we have flexibility in our leased ones, none of our assets are at material transition risk. In parallel, none of our assets are at material physical risk as a result of the climate change adaptation actions that we defined in the context of our Net-Zero Transition Plan (see pages 107-108).

In terms of revenue, we do not believe our revenue to be at risk due to physical climate risks in the short or medium term as our business is volatile and climate opportunities exceed climate risks. For the longer term, together with our EMEA partners, we will further investigate what our clients’ exposure is to physical climate risks and we will assess what the potential impact is on their business continuity.

Our climate related activities contribute to the following SDGs:

Objectives and ambition

Our environmental ambitions are anchored by both near-term and long-term targets, validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This validation confirms our net-zero goal is aligned with the Paris Agreement's objective to limit global warming to 1.5°C.

Our Netzero target: Deloitte commits to reach net-zero GHG emissions across the value chain by 2040.

Near-term targets:

  • Reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 70% by 2030 from a 2019 base year;

  • Reduce scope 3 GHG emissions from business travel 55% per full-time equivalent employee (FTE) by 2030 from a 2019 base year;

  • Engage with our suppliers, covering purchased goods & services and business travel, to have 67% by emissions set science-based targets by 2025. As this target has expired, we are waiting for DTTL to set a new target in line with SBTi guidance.

Long-term target:

  • Reduce absolute scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions 90% by 2040 from a 2019 base year.

For Deloitte Netherlands, we set additional goals, including achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030 and converting 100% of our vehicle fleet to electric by the end of 2025, which we fell short of fully achieving.

Governance

To embed climate actions across our organisation, we have set up a robust governance structure. Our dedicated Internal Sustainability Team translates our Transition plan into actionable steps for our operational functions, monitors progress, and reports directly to the Chief Quality & Risk Officer, who holds overall responsibility for sustainability. The team works with operational leads for real estate, travel, IT, and procurement to integrate sustainability into day-to-day decisions

Behavioural change is fundamental to our success. We aim to empower and enable individuals across the firm to make active contributions to our environmental and social goals. To support this, we facilitate two‑way communication at several key moments throughout the year, for example through roadshows in which we presented the sustainability strategy to each business and work together to define personal commitments. In April 2026, we celebrated Earth Month, conducting various activities to raise awareness and encourage colleague engagement.

Internationally, we participate in the Deloitte EMEA WorldClimate structure, collaborating to advance our CO2 reduction strategy and report progress to the EMEA Chief Sustainability Officer. We also draw on the Deloitte Global network for guidance on material topics and to align data definitions and methodologies. On a quarterly basis, we report progress to the EMEA team to support monitoring, identify challenges that require additional support, and collaborate across regions, benefiting from expertise in other countries.

Over the coming year, we will further formalise the integration of the net‑zero transition plan into our governance framework to enable effective steering and to provide leadership with regular updates on progress, challenges and critical decision points.

Finally, we believe working together and learning from each other supports the ongoing sustainability transition and challenges. Therefore we actively engage and learn from our peers. To this end,  Deloitte is member of:

  • Green Business Clubs in Amsterdam and Rotterdam;

  • UNGC, including active participation in Peer Learning Groups for Climate, Human Rights and Diversity;

  • MVO Nederland;

  • Coalitie Anders Reizen.

Transition plan – The road to net-zero

Achieving our net-zero ambition requires a fundamental transformation of our business operations. Our global Net-Zero Transition Plan provides a strategic, firm-wide roadmap that addresses our most material emission sources: travel, buildings, procurement, and technology– with critical enablers including accountability and culture ensuring net-zero is embedded in our decisions and actions as the shape, size and focus of the firm evolves over time.

Our Transition plan is based on four decarbonization levers: travel, responsible procurement, technology and buildings.

Travel

Emissions from travel can be split into two categories: national mobility (how people commute from home to the office or to client sites) and international business travel. Travel is one of the largest contributors to our carbon footprint, so it is a primary focus of our Net-Zero Transition Plan. Through targeted actions, we promote more sustainable travel choices to help mitigate climate change.

We are proud of the progress made over the last year on employee mobility. Our company vehicle lease schemes now exclusively offer electric vehicles. We committed to phasing out fossil‑fueled cars and we fell two cars short of achieving 100% electric vehicles in our leased fleet in 2025/2026 - an important milestone on our path to net-zero. As a next step, we will work with the automotive sector to ensure that temporary rental cars are electric, recognising that fossil‑fueled vehicles may still be used when our EVs are in for repairs. We are also seeking greater transparency from suppliers about the sources of electricity that are used for charging, as relying on a national average emission factor does not allow for conscious choices on where to charge and where not.

As a professional services organisation, we recognise the value of meeting our clients and colleagues face‑to‑face. At the same time, we strive to travel in a balanced way and to consider sustainability when making travel choices. Our business travel policy encourages people to travel only when necessary, to opt for virtual or hybrid meetings where appropriate, and to use local staff when possible. For essential trips we prioritise modes and routes that minimise CO2 emissions and cost. In line with our reduction ambitions, we favour rail over flights for short‑haul international journeys and recommend travel classes that reduce carbon intensity: Economy or Premium Economy for intercontinental travel, and Economy for flights under six hours.

To maintain oversight, carbon budgets for business travel are agreed with business COOs. These budgets set an allowable amount of CO2 (in tonnes) attributable to business travel and reflect expected behavioural change and industry developments. Progress against the budgets is monitored quarterly and used to steer performance throughout the year in order for us to meet our preset targets.

Deloitte does not believe investments or disposals will be necessary as a result of managing material sustainability matters. Deloitte's strategy is sourced through our normal planning cycle: costs are absorbed in the current year P&L.

Responsible procurement

We recognise the environmental impact of the goods and services we buy and are working with suppliers to reduce demand and find more sustainable alternatives - for example, by products with enhanced longevity or with materials from responsible sources. Sustainability is being embedded across supplier selection, contracting and ongoing engagement.

This year, we have increasingly included sustainability criteria in the selection of our strategic suppliers. Suppliers are asked to provide sustainability information during tender processes, and this information is scored as part of the selection criteria.

The principles we apply are set out in our Responsible Procurement Policy (RPP), launched in 2025. The RPP has been referenced in our updated general purchasing conditions for new suppliers. Beyond embedding the policy in contracts, we proactively engage strategic suppliers to discuss the RPP, identify any gaps, and agree on necessary follow‑up actions.

We aim to ensure suppliers adhere to the RPP and to collaborate with them to accelerate the availability of more sustainable products and services. Together, we identify potential more sustainable alternatives for the goods and services we purchase.

Technology

Technology is a principal focus of our Net‑Zero Transition Plan because its emissions are significant and expected to rise. We aim to decouple our reliance on technology from rising greenhouse‑gas emissions through initiatives across 1) hardware, 2) cloud services, 3) software and applications, and 4) generative AI. Understanding these impacts and embedding sustainability into how we design, run and procure technology is essential.

  1. Hardware | We aim to reduce unnecessary material consumption, right‑size our device estate, extend device longevity and prioritise refurbished or recycled‑content devices when procurement is required. For end‑user hardware, we have formalised repair and refurbishment partnerships, including with Fixje, to extend lifetime and support reuse, repair and responsible recycling.

  2. Cloud services | we want to improve the efficiency of our data, applications, software and infrastructure — including cloud and third‑party infrastructure under our control — and where we can further optimise their operation.

  3. Software and applications | we are embedding net‑zero expectations into our relationships with technology suppliers, building on our Responsible Procurement Policy.

  4. Generative AI | Generative AI is an emerging area requiring focused attention. As adoption grows, so does the computational and energy demand it creates. We take this seriously and are actively improving our understanding so we can manage and reduce its environmental impact going forward.

Buildings

Our real estate strategy prioritises occupying energy‑efficient buildings and working with owners and stakeholders to make our offices “Paris Proof”, resilient and aligned with the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement. This requires substantial investment and close collaboration. Our Amsterdam office, The Edge, and our Rotterdam office, Maastoren, both have high energy‑performance ratings, including BREEAM certification.

Where we manage energy contracts directly, we partner with Groendus, an energy marketplace, to match our energy consumption with renewable sources. We also encourage landlords to adopt green energy for the buildings we occupy.

In line with our global Real Estate Policy, we are setting energy‑reduction targets and implementing further efficiency measures. This commitment extends to fit‑outs: we apply circular‑economy principles and work with suppliers to measure and reduce the environmental impact of renovation projects.

Current and future financial resources allocated to climate action are integrated in the budgets of the topic owners (e.g, Workplace Services for fleet and housing, IT for technology, and Procurement for supply chain. In addition, some activities are led by and paid for by EMEA. 

Policies

IROs addressed

Actions

Challenges

Next-steps

Travel

Deloitte Travel policy
Deloitte mobility policies

1, 3, 6

Established and monitored annual carbon budgets for each business, with quarterly COO reviews to steer performance. A carbon emissions travel dashboard tracks key travel metrics continuously.
Booking nudges: the travel portal includes information and behavioural nudges to encourage lower‑emission choices at the point of booking.

We acknowledge that as a business we will continue important business travel. It is therefore important that alongside the ongoing focus on behaviour change, industry developments accelerate the decarbonization of the entire sector.
To play an active role in this transition, we support and participate in these developments. We are thereby actively pursuing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) agreements and other collaborative initiatives.

Continue employee engagement on carbon budgets and sustainable travel choices.
Explore ways to use the booking platform to nudge lower‑carbon decisions — for example, clearer carbon information, prompts or low‑carbon defaults at the point of booking. We will maintain carbon budgets and monitor detailed travel data to guide activity and target interventions where the greatest emissions reductions are achievable.

Supply Chain

Responsible Procurement Policy

1, 3, 6

Policy: roll-out of the responsible procurement policy.
Contracting: included the responsible procurement policy in the general purchasing conditions.
Supplier engagement: initiated supplier engagement conversations to explore sustainable alternatives with (strategic) suppliers.
Integrate sustainability selection criteria for some of the strategic supplier selection procedures.

To be able to monitor and steer periodically, supplier specific data on the products and services that we purchase is needed. Therefore we will work together with suppliers to discuss more sustainable alternatives for the products and services we purchase and obtain supplier specific information when possible.

Continue supplier engagement conversations with (strategic) suppliers to work towards more sustainable alternatives for the goods and services we purchase.
Include reference to the RPP in new supplier contracts through the general purchasing conditions.

Technology

Firm-wide Net-Zero Transition Plan
Responsible Procurement Policy.

1, 3, 6

Strengthened our circular hardware practices by refurbishing all laptops from offboarding employees and partnering with certified vendors who use salvaged parts for repairs.
Expanded our reuse programme to include IT accessories, establishing a process to collect, clean, and redeploy items like headsets from offboarding employees.
Initiated a major refresh of our office printer fleet, replacing existing units with remanufactured devices and reducing the total number of printers by nearly 35%.

Limited availability of granular emissions data from technology suppliers.
Quantifying the emissions savings from specific actions (e.g., AI optimisation) and accurately measuring technology's overall contribution to our carbon footprint.

Enhance technology emissions data to target and prioritise reduction initiatives.
Embed sustainability criteria into technology procurement and supplier contracts.
Extend circular practices, such as refurbishment and repair, to include all hardware accessories.
Develop methods to measure and manage the energy impact of emerging technologies like Generative AI.

Buildings

Global Real Estate Policy
Deloitte NL Housing Policy

1, 3, 6

Applied a new sustainable fit-out approach with defined KPIs to our major renovation project in The Edge office.
Increased the matching of our energy consumption with local wind power through our partnership with Groendus for three office locations.
Utilised the NSE Real Estate scorecard in office negotiations to prioritise energy efficiency and sustainability improvements.

Driving energy reduction measures in multi-tenant buildings where progress depends on the collaboration of landlords and other tenants.

Roll out the Global Real Estate Policy across all offices, with a focus on energy reduction and increasing green energy procurement.
Further mature our sustainable fit-out process by embedding KPIs and introducing waste tracking for all upcoming renovation projects.

Certification

Our sustainability progress is recognised externally. This year we moved from Silver to Gold in our EcoVadis rating, a global sustainability‑ratings platform, placing us in the top 5% of companies in our industry (n=1,239). The EcoVadis scorecard is available to trading partners on request.

We also achieved the second step under the new standards of the CO₂ Performance Ladder certification scheme. The certificate and supporting documentation are available on our website.

(Beyond) value‑chain mitigation

While pursuing an absolute emissions reduction of at least 90% by 2040, Deloitte uses both carbon offsets and direct investments in Beyond Value Chain Mitigation (BVCM) projects to support climate mitigation on the path to net-zero. BVCM projects address emissions reductions beyond our direct operations and immediate supply chain, for example through large‑scale renewable energy, landscape restoration or avoided‑emissions activities.

For 2024/25, Deloitte NSE compensated CO2 emissions across all NSE geographies by investing in a range of certified carbon‑avoidance and renewable‑energy projects. We also acquired RE100‑compliant, EKOenergy‑certified renewable energy certificates (issued under the European Energy Certificate System, EECS) to green all non‑renewable electricity consumption, including the power used to charge our electric fleet.

Once total CO2 emissions for 2025/26 have been verified, NSE will again procure credits to compensate those emissions. In addition, we have also begun participating in BVCM projects across the EMEA region.

These compensation purchases and BVCM investments do not alter our reported emissions results figures.

Systemic challenges

Our greatest impact comes from the work we do with clients and through collaboration. We embed sustainability into client projects to accelerate transformations across industries, focusing our expertise on a number of complex, system‑level challenges:

  • Accelerating the energy transition | We help clients define credible paths to net‑zero and scale low‑carbon solutions. Our global centre of excellence for hydrogen plays a key role in supporting the move to cleaner energy systems;

  • Developing a sustainable food system | Through research and our Net Positive Network, we promote a food system that operates within planetary boundaries. Our work targets regenerative agriculture, reducing food waste, and the protein transition — shifting diets and supply chains towards lower‑impact protein sources;

  • Building a circular economy | We develop practical solutions to embed circularity in products and processes. For the third consecutive year we contributed to the global Circularity Gap Report, and we helped develop the Global Circularity Protocol for Business with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and UNEP’s One Planet Network;

  • Enabling a nature‑positive society | We are committed to helping halt and reverse nature loss. Working with partners such as WWF‑Netherlands, we support the adoption of the Taskforce on Nature‑related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) framework across the financial sector.

These areas reflect where we can use our skills and relationships to drive large‑scale, lasting change.

­

We made the following considerations when determining which Scope 3 emissions are relevant to Deloitte:

Table 06: Considerations for inclusion Scope 3 emissions

Description

Consideration

Conclusion

Purchased goods and services

Is material on the basis of our spend

Included

- Optional sub-category: Cloud computing and data centre services Capital goods

Is part of Purchased goods and services

Excluded

- Optional sub-category: Capital goods

Deloitte is asset-light hence emissions are limited

Included

Fuel and energy-related activities

Well-to-tank emissions as a result of fuel consumption in our fleet

Included

Upstream leased assets

We rent our offices and are not in control in most of them for heat and power

Included

Waste generated in operations

Included as we strive towards a zero-waste workplace

Included

Processing of sold products

We do not process sold products

Excluded

Use of sold products

We sell services and not products so not applicable

Excluded

End-of-life treatment of sold products

We sell services and not products so not applicable

Excluded

Downstream leased assets

We have no downstream leased assets

Excluded

Franchises

We have no franchises

Excluded

Upstream transportation and distribution

As we do not process or sell products, there is no upstream transportation and distribution

Excluded

Downstream transportation and distribution

As we do not process or sell products, there is no downstream transportation and distribution

Excluded

Business travels

Business travel is a significant part of our GHG emissions

Included

Employee commuting

With over 7 thousand employees, employee commuting has the potential of being a significant source of GHG emissions

Included

Financial investments

We do not have financial investments

Excluded

Table 07: Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions per scope*

Base year*

Retrospective

Milestones and target years

2018/2019

2025/2026

2024/2025

Δ previous year (%)

2030

2040

Annual % target

Scope 1 GHG emissions

Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

14,511

1,598

3,793

-57.9%

0

0

% of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes (%)

0

0

0

0.0%

0

0

Scope 2 GHG emissions

Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

2,153

3,466

4,010

-13.6%

0

0

Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

414

0

30

-100.0%

0

0

Significant scope 3 GHG emissions

Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

33,933

8,252

11,916

-30.8%

17,377

4,714

1. Purchased goods and services

17,244

***

11,622**

-

10,346

2,587

3. Fuel and energy-related activities

4,744

1,240

1,977

-37.3%

1,680

0

5. Waste generated in operations

N/A

38

43

-11.7%

39

35

6. Business traveling

11,889

4,928

7,615

-35.3%

3,567

1,783

7. Employee commuting

N/A

71

80

-11.1%

1,543

309

- Working from home

N/A

1,859

1,937

-4.0%

8. Upstream leased assets

55

116

264

-56.2%

202

0

Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO2eq)

50,596

13,315

31,341

-57.5%

17,377

4,714

Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO2eq)

48,858

9,850

27,361

-64.0%

17,377

4,714

* We have selected 2018/2019 as our base year as this is the last year that was unaffected by the restrictions during the COVID pandemic and was therefore selected by DTTL as the base year for the WorldClimate strategy. We believe that 2018/2019 still is a valid year to measure progress against.

** We have recalculated and restated our prior period (2024/2025) PG&S emissions data. Since 2018/2019, we have made changes to our PG&S emissions reporting methodology following developments in best practice and improvements in data granularity and systems. As a result, we are unable to apply all changes retrospectively. This limits the comparability of reported emissions for 2024/2025 and 2025/2026 to the baseline year.

*** To a large extent, our emissions related to Purchased goods and services are calculated by DTTL and EMEA on the basis of relevant spend. Due to a change in the methodology, their conclusions for 2025/2026 were not available in time for inclusion in and review of the PDF of our report. 

To determine Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions, we have taken the RECs purchased by Deloitte NSE into account as these cover both electricity consumption for offices and for charging electric vehicles. With the reduction of cars with an internal combustion engine, we saw the related Scope 1 GHG emissions further reducing. Business travel emissions saw a decrease primarily as a result of lower emission factors as published by DEFRA. 

Table 08: Greenhouse gas intensity*

2025/2026**

2024/2025

2023/2024

Δ FY26 vs FY25**

GHG intensity per net revenue

Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue (tCO2eq/1,000 euro)

0.009

0.020

0.017

-54.3%

Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue (tCO2eq/1,000 euro)

0.007

0.017

0.017

-58.4%

* Greenhouse gas intensity is calculated using 'Revenue' as included in the 'Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended May 31, 2025, in Annex 1 of this report.

** The data for 2025/2026 excludes emissions due to Purchased goods & services

Table 09: Housing

2025/2026

2024/2025

Scope 1 thermal energy consumption

1,461

GJ

1,672

GJ

- from renewable sources

0

GJ

0

GJ

Scope 2 energy consumption

1,061,178

kWh

2,163,998

kWh

- renewable sources

1,061,178

kWh

1,782,667

kWh

- nuclear sources

0

kWh

0

kWh

- self generated

0

kWh

0

kWh

- non-renewable sources or unknown

0

kWh

381,331

kWh

Scope 3 energy consumption

8,547,566

kWh

10,789,690

kWh

- renewable sources

7,990,407

kWh

9,672,882

kWh

- non-renewable sources or unknown

557,159

kWh

1,116,808

kWh

Specific electricity consumption

92.59

kWh/m2

101.41

kWh/m2

Specific thermal energy consumption

0.022

GJ/m2

0.136

GJ/m2

Table 10: Mobility

2025/2026

2024/2025

Number of lease cars

3,534

3,538

- electric cars (incl. plug-in hybrids)

3,528

2,769

Total kilometres travelled by leased cars

82,884,296

101,312,897

Total emissions fossil fuels (Scope 1)

1,524

t CO2e

3,708

t CO2e

Total emissions electric cars (Scope 2)

3,232

t CO2e

3,499

t CO2e

Total kilometres travelled by air

21,146,901

km

21,805,449

km

Total emissions air travel (Scope 3)

4,179

t CO2e

6,808

t CO2e

Total emissions air travel per FTE

596

kg CO2e/FTE

929

kg CO2e/FTE

Total hotel nights

20,766

22,335

Total emissions hotels (Scope 3)

690

t CO2e

742*

t CO2e

Total kilometres international rail travel

2,275,301

km

2,161,741

km

Total emissions international rail travel (Scope 3)

10

t CO2e

11

t CO2e

Total kilometres employee commuting

7,674,476

km

8,982,840

km

Total emissions employee commuting (scope 3)

71

t CO2e

80

t CO2e

Total mobility related CO2 emissions

9,016

t CO2e

14,848

t CO2e

Total mobility CO2 emissions intensity

0.079

kg CO2/km

0.105

kg CO2/km

* We restated hotel nights emissions for 2024/2025 as the methodology applied allowed for double countings. For more information, please see Annex 3: Basis of reporting on page 153.